Overview
What is Forcepoint SWG?
The Forcepoint ONE Secure Web Gateway (SWG) is one of the three foundational gateways of the Forcepoint ONE all-in-one cloud platform. Forcepoint ONE SWG monitors and controlsany interaction with any website, including blocking access to websites based on category and…
Forcepoint is a force to reckon with!
Protects the organization
WebSecurity
Decent product with poor support
Meets requirements but in our experience does not lend itself well to remote workers
Forcepoint Web Security: Content security for SMB, which is good enough for even large enterprises
Forcepoint Web Security: Secures Your Browsing Traffic
Extend content and threat protection to off-premises EUC
Forcepoint Web Security: An application that does what we expect it to do
Forcepoint Web Security- The Industy leader in Content filtering and Security
Reassured Cybersecurity
You can make it better
Forcepoint Security
Forcepoint killed 'em all!
Excellent threat protection and Productivity monitoring with now in house overheads.
Awards
Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards
Product Demos
Mac OS Endpoint Installation | Forcepoint Web Security Cloud
Product Details
- About
- Competitors
- Tech Details
- FAQs
What is Forcepoint SWG?
Forcepoint SWG Features
- Supported: Shadow IT discovery and risk ranking
- Supported: Cloud Application Control and full CASB upgrade
- Supported: Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
- Supported: Cloud Sandbox
Forcepoint SWG Video
Forcepoint SWG Competitors
Forcepoint SWG Technical Details
Deployment Types | On-premise, Software as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based |
---|---|
Operating Systems | Windows, Linux, Mac |
Mobile Application | No |
Frequently Asked Questions
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews and Ratings
(137)Community Insights
- Business Problems Solved
- Pros
- Cons
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway has proven to be a valuable tool for organizations in various departments, ensuring secure browsing of the internet and addressing a range of security concerns. Users have reported that the application effectively blocks malicious threats while allowing users to browse the internet, providing an effective layer of security. This has helped organizations protect their computers and laptops from potential threats, giving IT departments peace of mind.
Additionally, the software has been instrumental in managing productivity, as it enables different departments to access specific categories of websites and allows managers to review internet activity. HR teams have found value in the user site visit data managed by Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway, which has proven helpful in certain cases. Moreover, the ability to quickly generate standard reports from the report catalog has made it easier for organizations to monitor web traffic and measure internet usage.
In public-sector organizations, the software ensures that users and staff are accessing websites aligned with mission goals. Libraries have leveraged its functionality to enable filtering of staff and patron internet usage, meeting requirements for CIPA compliance and qualifying for E-Rate funding.
Customers have also praised Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway's scalability and ease of deployment across multiple locations. The granular delegation of administration via active directory has allowed local departments to implement their own rule sets, enhancing efficiency and effectiveness.
Overall, customers have found this product to be a reliable solution for securing web traffic, preventing threats, managing productivity, and ensuring compliance with organizational policies.
Helpful and Clear Help Articles: Reviewers have praised the clear and helpful help articles provided by Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway. These articles were found to be a valuable resource in understanding and utilizing the software effectively, with some users mentioning that they served as a comprehensive reference point for various tasks and functionalities. The availability of these detailed and informative articles not only contributed to a smoother learning curve but also helped troubleshoot issues independently, reducing the reliance on customer service support.
Time-saving Feature: Users appreciate the time-saving aspect of Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway's clear and easily accessible help articles. With these resources readily available, reviewers mentioned being able to find answers to their questions quickly, allowing them to continue working without interruptions. This feature has been particularly useful in minimizing downtime caused by seeking support from customer service or navigating complex user manuals.
Commitment to Customer Satisfaction: The inclusion of clear help articles demonstrates Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway's commitment to customer satisfaction. Reviewers highlighted how this comprehensive resource eliminates unnecessary back-and-forth communication with customer support, as it provides extensive information upfront. By offering detailed guidance through these articles, Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway ensures users have access to reliable self-help options, enhancing overall user experience.
-
Poor User Interface: Multiple users have expressed frustration with the confusing and non-user-friendly interface of Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway, making it difficult to navigate and causing difficulties during installation.
-
Limited Configuration Options: Some users feel that the software lacks flexibility in defining usage, as the options for configuring policies and exceptions are limited compared to other available options in the market.
-
Slow Support Response Times: Users have reported slower support response times compared to other vendors, with issues taking 3 to 5 days to resolve, indicating a need for more efficient and responsive customer support from Forcepoint.
Attribute Ratings
Reviews
(1-25 of 52)Protects the organization
- It can be integrated with the DLP module
- Hybrid capabilities
- Can be integrated with Forcepoint AMD for sandboxing
- Helps us to restrict access of unwanted sites
- The hybrid agent should get updated automatically
- Some sites are not proxy friendly, which causes issues
- Time taken for the policy to sync in cloud
Decent product with poor support
- Quota Time.
- Somewhat easy redirection of web traffic.
- Enforcement is inconsistent at times.
- Seems to cause connection timeouts with certain websites.
- Very poor product support.
Meets requirements but in our experience does not lend itself well to remote workers
- Forcepoint Web Security met our requirements for a scalable on-premises secure web gateway solution.
- Forcepoint Web Security met our requirements for providing flexible policy assignments for users.
- Our largest challenge with Forcepoint Web Security is the difficulty of performing version upgrades.
Forcepoint Web Security: Content security for SMB, which is good enough for even large enterprises
- Full SASE suite for threat and data security
- Robust ACE engine
- DLP integration
- Sandboxing
- Control and visibility for non-web protocol
- Application visibility and CASB
Extend content and threat protection to off-premises EUC
- Policy enforcement
- Content filtering
- Threat detection
- Mobile device protection
- Failover capability
- Vendor support
- It prevents users from accessing websites that may have recently been created for the purpose of distributing malware.
- It prevents users from accidentally or intentionally accessing websites that are considered inappropriate for a work environment.
- It allows us to create different policies for different teams in our organization.
- Forcepoint Web Security can be improved by making the setup less bloated. We have two proxy servers clustered together for each environment, and we currently have environments for our campus, server, DMZ, and external networks. The setup and maintenance of the application can be cumbersome.
- Updating the agent needs to be implemented better. Instead of having to create and push out updates for the agents, there should be a way agents can get software updates directly from Forcepoint Web Security.
- Accessing the web content gateway to make changes is also not as streamlined as I would like and it should be improved.
- Categorization
- Real-time security updates for threat protection
- It has a centralized granular policy controls
- Content Filtering
- Customer Support
- Scalability and throughput
- Documentation availability
- Pricing should be bit lower
Reassured Cybersecurity
- Forcepoint DLP alerts of potential data security issues with data leaving the organization.
- Forcepoint web filtering also protected against users navigating to malicious sites.
- Endpoint solution supports logging and monitoring to alert security control center.
- Fine tuning is required for various DLP flags.
- False positives require deep-dive investigations so staffing and timing are required for research.
- Web filtering not always accurate and additional tuning needed for categorization.
Forcepoint killed 'em all!
We set up a hierarchy inside Forcepoint Security Manager, to grant access of each defined location/company to the respective IT department.
- URL filtering.
- Scalability of the management.
- Easy way to update endpoints.
- Middle East area (where Government blocks traffic to your local PoP).
- China area (where you don't have local PoP so it's impossible to point to cloud proxy out of China, because traffic hits the Great Firewall and traffic is sometimes blocked for secured connections).
- Support expertise.
As above, worst scenarios of implementation are countries where government intercepts and modifies secured connections.
In those locations we had to disable cloud proxy and permits access using only local Content Gateways.
Also for VPN users, to grant them to accesso to Gsuite, we set up to allow them to use office Internet line to access this service.
Excellent threat protection and Productivity monitoring with now in house overheads.
- Blocks malicious sites.
- Allows restriction complete or by time to sites such as social media.
- Provides keyword content and category blocking of sites.
- Provides extensive reporting for browsing and security alerts.
- Ability to temporarily disable the proxy.
- More flexible client deployment options.
- Web chat support.
May the FORCEpoint be with You
- DLP
- Analytics
- Email Security
- Better UI
- Possibly better documentation
Forcepoint Web Security offers comfort and security
- Advanced threat protection
- Set it and forget it
- Any user, any device, any location
- Change in web content control happens quickly
- None I can think of
Forcepoint: Great results easily implemented.
- Blocks malicious and compromised websites.
- Provides a raft of customizable detailed metrics.
- Provides very easy to implement content filtering of which there is a lot of default framework ready to go.
- The endpoint software at times can be a little glitchy.
- Would be good to be able to temporarily disable the filter via the client for troubleshooting and admin purposes.
- Would be good to be able to manually set a Geo location for better response.
Forcepoint Web Security - The Only Choice
- Web category filtering.
- Governance and compliance.
- Investigative reporting.
- Real time monitoring on the cloud platform would be good to have.
It is less appropriate for real-time monitoring as this is not possible at this point in time from what I understand.
- It gives us a high-level snapshot of what are users are doing online.
- It allows us to have a generous Acceptable Use Policy because we know that abuses will be easy to spot.
- It gives us a way to allow temporary access to otherwise blocked sites.
- Its tools for creating policies and exceptions is confusing in certain areas.
- Some of its online help topics don't provide as much detail as we would like.
Forcepoint helps our SOC be proactive
- Block Malicious Sites
- DLP
- Ease of Use
- Cloud based could use more granularity
- Easier backend access
- Cloud HA
ForcePoint Web Security: Solid, but not great
- Allows content filtering.
- Guards against potential threats.
- Administrative overhead.
- Time to resolve issues with support.
Overall a good solid product.
- Web filtering works well
- Hybrid client has no issues
- O365 filtering was different but improving
- FTP filtering is difficult
- Forcepoint Category Database is always updated based on content available on the web rather than another competitor.
- Content scanning engine which provides real time content scanning/categorization is another feature to prevent malicious activity.
- I worked on versions 7.6, 8.2 and 8.5.3. But in latest version Forcepoint enables most features as default which which was optional in older versions.
Quick analysis and access list for the small/medium environment.
- The real-time monitoring tool allows for quick analysis of users traffic.
- Exceptions, makes allowing one-off accesses easy and allows for notes.
- Command-line functionality seems limited and not very user friendly.
- Online documentation to assist in solving errors quickly isn't easy to find what your looking for or isn't relevant to your problem.
Forcepoint Web Security: The One to Beat
Forcepoint is especially critical in worker productivity as reports can be run against users and departments on internet usage. We especially like that the threat database and site categorization is constantly being updated throughout the day.
- Limit access to sites by category
- Block malicious content
- Easier software upgrades
- Cloud offering for management of content gateway/on premise infrastructure
Forcepoint Web Security may be less appropriate in very small environments--less than 1,000 users--or where there might not be an admin to maintain the system frequently.
Forcepoint protects our organization from malicious sites and allows us to institute our ISSP.
- Ease of Use
- Ease to Manage
- A bit complicated to setup
- Too many server pieces to integrate
Forcepoint Web is easy to use in a single pane of glass view.
- Web filtering
- Stability
- Web filtering
- SSL decryption
Forcepoint Web Security Review
- Blocking unwanted websites
- Presentation of data for reports
- Product support after implementation
- Navigation of primary portal
- Globally block a site for the whole organization.
- Restrict social media access to specific groups across the organization.
- The user access logs contain a lot of useless information. I understand this is very hard to tackle as I've seen this across any product that logs web activity.
- I would like to see more customization options of website block pages.